This is quite possibly one of the stupidest laws Belgium has created in the 21st century. Of course, you have to think about it logically (which very few people do these days) to see how stupid it is:
A virtual box with a virtual pink dress in it: $5. Belgium: "Okay!"
A virtual box with a 50% possibility of getting one of two virtual dresses, one pink and the other red: $5. Belgium: "Nope, that's gambling. Here's a fine and a cease-and-desist."
Yes, Belgium, gambling is bad. But considering anything that has any amount of chance and has any amount of money involved, "gambling?" That's absurd.
am not going in to whos fault was, they are team they could mangeI'd just like to point out that lawbreakers wasn't their game. They were simply a publisher and the developer of that game had a history of abandoning things.lawbreakers (failed)
Edit: Correction, this was the game he abandoned when it started to go south, giving him the history when he also abandoned Radical Heights.
Point is, this wasn't Nexon's fault. (Now there's a shocker.)
yea those are some of the top games that has well balanced systems that dont afect gameplay at allAggraphine wrote: »Well i am happy for the change but this is a free to play game, how do u expect them to make revenue now?
like evry other top ranked game sell ingame cosmetic, irl merch, live events and much more thats the true free2play game
btw gambling and p2w/f2p its not same
nexon can directly sell the items to the market,advert correctly and sell as it is
with gambling its much worse (especially when its not controled/protected by government or other official )
What "top ranked games" are you referring to? Because a lot of the top-ranked games that I can think of off the top of my head still sell loot boxes in one form or another. Overwatch, League, Fortnite, PUBG, CS:GO; they all sell loot boxes full of cosmetics.