[New Users] Please note that all new users need to be approved before posting. This process can take up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.
Check out the v.255 - The Dark Ride: Ride or DIe Patch Notes here!
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the Forums Code of Conduct: https://forums.maplestory.nexon.net/discussion/29556/code-of-conducts

Remove 5 characters limit from Synergy Ring.

WloHuWloHu
Reactions: 720
Posts: 5
Member
edited July 2018 in Suggestions, Feedback, and Requests
http://forums.maplestory.nexon.net/discussion/15456/stuck-synergy-ring

I kind of understand the idea here but IMO if, in game or application, something is possible to be done in less convenient way then either the feature should be blocked or simplified.
So the inconvenient, current, way to equip Synergy Ring on a "6th" character is to:
- log out,
- log into listed Synergy Ring character,
- unequip the ring,
- log out,
- log in back to the 6th character
- equip the ring.

Where it could just be:
- Equip the ring.

In either case the effect is the same: 6th character was able to equip Synergy Ring. The difference is that in 1st case I have to waste like minute or two just to wear some piece of equipment. If you think that is a good idea make such limitation/annoyance on every piece of equipment.
darik
  1. Remove 5 characters limit from Synergy Ring?11 votes
    1. Yes.
       91% (10 votes)
    2. No.
       9% (1 vote)

Comments

  • EnokumoEnokumo
    Reactions: 1,610
    Posts: 122
    Member
    edited July 2018
    It feels like it's an unintended restriction, I can't see any plausible reason why they'd limit it to five characters - except something gets awfully broken (e.g. applying another set bonus)
    WloHu
  • WloHuWloHu
    Reactions: 720
    Posts: 5
    Member
    edited February 2019
    Bumping.

    So far 100% agreement means that it really is an annoying issue. I would like to GMs/Mods respond to that to let everyone reading this know the issue is at least being considered.
  • JushiroNetJushiroNet
    Reactions: 6,160
    Posts: 748
    Member, Private Tester
    edited February 2019
    This seems like a good QoL change.