[New Users] Please note that all new users need to be approved before posting. This process can take up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.
Check out the v.237 Ignition: Cygnus Knights Redux Patch Notes here!
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the Forums Code of Conduct: https://forums.maplestory.nexon.net/discussion/29556/code-of-conducts
Closed

Durability System

DaxterbeerDaxterbeer
Reactions: 7,040
Posts: 1,000
Member
edited May 2020 in Suggestions, Feedback, and Requests
Should our weapons have a durability limit that decreases when used? When durability is depleted, the items breaks without leaving a trace. Players would need to stock up on potions AND weapons to survive a boss fights. This will make fast attacking classes break their weapons faster and need to replace their weapon immediately.

Players would need to replace, rescroll, recube their weapon every time. So a battle with Hard Lucid would require MULTIPLE perfected Arcane weapons as you might break 3 during the first phase. You might have to finish off the battle with weapons from Lith Harbor . I don't care if you have to farm droplets without a weapon. You can just use a rune of might or thunder if you have no weapon.

What do you guys thinks of durability?
  1. Do you think having a durability system for equipment is a good idea?22 votes
    1. Yes
       18% (4 votes)
    2. No
       82% (18 votes)

Comments

  • bazzybazzy
    Reactions: 1,525
    Posts: 71
    Member, Private Tester
    edited May 2020
    god this is a terrible idea. Farming 240 droplets already is terrible with the terrible drop rate. Farming 240 more for another weapon in addition to running lucid for butterfly droplets sounds absolutely awful. Constantly having to replace your weapon sounds extremely unnecessary and inconvenient, as Reboot would get rekt by this. Perfecting a weapon alone costs up to 40b meso, imagine having to constantly spend 40b on a brand new weapon.
  • AaronHuskyAaronHusky
    Reactions: 2,485
    Posts: 174
    Member, Private Tester
    edited May 2020
    Why are you actively trying to ruin quality of life for everyone?
    bazzyCutieMikuKradian_SouthJettLuvsUUwUwOwOShadEightSlicedTime
  • DaxterbeerDaxterbeer
    Reactions: 7,040
    Posts: 1,000
    Member
    edited May 2020
    AaronHusky wrote: »
    Why are you actively trying to ruin quality of life for everyone?

    I'm making Anna look good by being bad. And don't worry, they won't read/listen to our suggestions so this won't happen.
  • LatemasterLatemaster
    Reactions: 1,680
    Posts: 138
    Member
    edited May 2020
    well there is already durability system for some items but it takes several hours to break an item anyways and with that system you just have to pay little amount of meso to get full durability again. It wouldn't really matter that much if that was applied to all items but complete break and several times within 1 run would be bit too much.
  • ThatRandomShadeThatRandomShade
    Reactions: 1,250
    Posts: 67
    Member
    edited May 2020
    wat.
  • ToreishiToreishi
    Reactions: 3,265
    Posts: 114
    Member
    edited May 2020
    No, because endgame equips are expensive and no one would want to upgrade their equips all over again.
  • FuhreakFuhreak
    Reactions: 6,990
    Posts: 1,310
    Member, Private Tester
    edited May 2020
    Daxterbeer wrote: »
    AaronHusky wrote: »
    Why are you actively trying to ruin quality of life for everyone?

    I'm making Anna look good by being bad. And don't worry, they won't read/listen to our suggestions so this won't happen.

    All you do is make Nexon want to take our suggestions less serious. Please stop making us look bad.
    CutieMikuKradian_SouthUwUwOwOAaronHuskySlicedTime
  • AggraphineAggraphine
    Reactions: 19,405
    Posts: 3,553
    Member
    edited June 2020
  • ShadEightShadEight
    Reactions: 3,110
    Posts: 381
    Member
    edited June 2020
    Daxterbeer wrote: »
    And don't worry, they won't read/listen to our suggestions so this won't happen.

    clearly you haven't heard.
This discussion has been closed.