[New Users] Please note that all new users need to be approved before posting. This process can take up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.
Check out the v.254 - Midnight Carnival - Ludibrium Patch Notes here!
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the Forums Code of Conduct: https://forums.maplestory.nexon.net/discussion/29556/code-of-conducts

Remove boss timers

AKradianAKradian
Reactions: 40,340
Posts: 6,342
Member, Private Tester
edited October 2016 in Suggestions, Feedback, and Requests
In the beginning, MapleStory didn't have time limits on boss fights. It was expected that major bosses would take a long time to defeat.
Major boss fights were a big drain on server resources, so each boss only had a few channels on which it could be fought (and there was only a single instance for each channel). Zakum could only be faced on 3 channels, HT on two, and Pink Bean, when we got it, just one.
Busy servers set up schedules, where groups had to pre-register for their boss fights in advance. In some cases, certain unsavory groups appropriated the boss and would not let anyone else in to fight it (a.k.a "Cave Holding").

Eventually the power creep caught up with these bosses, and more and more groups could take on them, or thought they could. So time limits were introduced: "If you can't finish off the boss in an hour, get out and let someone else try." It was a necessity because the bosses were in very limited supply.

Later on that was no longer enough, and so we got instanced boss fights (where up to 20 groups could fight the same boss in the same channel at the same time, but separately), and the ability to fight those bosses in all channels. That made enough bosses for everybody. But the time limits remained. And new bosses get them too. Sometimes even a double check (looking at you, Gollux Jewel).

The only purpose time limits serve right now is a DPS check, perpetuating the gap between funded and unfunded. If a boss has X HP and you only get Y minutes to kill it, then you (or your 6-person party) must dish out at least X/Y HP-per-Minute of damage to have a chance. (Obviously, bosses also have some mechanisms that prevent you from constantly doing your optimal damage on them. But I'm talking about the absolute minimum requirement). This is not fair to the players and not good for the game.

TL;DR: I believe that if someone wants to fight Hell Gollux, and has the control and focus necessary to survive for however long it takes them to defeat it - be it 2 minutes or 2 hours - then they deserve whatever rewards they can get. It's not fair to lock them out just because they haven't put "enough" effort (or cash) into their gear.
SparkzCatoooloooDoughWillScarletPoohsBasura

Comments

  • XenomataXenomata
    Reactions: 2,595
    Posts: 287
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    Other games rank you based on how fast you do a thing and rewards you the better rank you get, Maple just tells you that you have 30 minutes with no incentive to kill the boss any faster, just that you can kill the boss at all.
    I don't think removing the time limit is a good idea whatsoever, but replacing it with a ranking system that rewards you the faster you can take down a boss...
    Would you rather be told that you took to long to kill the boss and get an F and, therefore, get worse rewards, or would you rather be pulled out of the room because you went one second over 30 minutes?
    You'll still get all the time in the world, but I think receiving a reward because you did the boss good is a much more rewarding experience than receiving a reward because you spent all day poking Hard Lotus with a stick and finally killed him. I mean, this is still a game regardless of the direction it went in, the player does still deserve that "rewarding experience"
    JettLuvsUVekilo
  • AKradianAKradian
    Reactions: 40,340
    Posts: 6,342
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    On the contrary, I'd give better rewards if you managed to survive Hard Lotus for a day.
    If it were as easy as poking him with a stick, I'd agree with you, but since the new bosses have all sorts of mechanisms that keep you on your toes, it's actually a lot easier to pour so much cash into your character that you can kill the boss before it gets its shots in, than it is to survive an extended fight. Especially with the removal of the damage cap in V, we see previously "top tier" bosses being offed in seconds... somehow I don't think that merits extra rewards. Quite the opposite.

    Case in point: the new Zakum actually gives you more exp if you take the time to kill its arms separately before touching the main body, than if you 1-hit it.

    I think the game is pay2win enough without giving even more rewards to high-rollers. Punishing someone for doing their best with their limited resources is just adding insult to injury.

    But I think we don't need different rewards at all. If you kill the boss, you get its exp and drops, regardless of how long it took you. All I'm suggesting is to remove the timers and give a chance to people who have more skill than cash.
  • AggraphineAggraphine
    Reactions: 19,415
    Posts: 3,553
    Member
    edited October 2016
    In fairness to the new Zakum, if you can hit the arms and body in one go, you get the exp for eight arms alongside actually killing the whole thing.

    What makes it worse, also, is the amount of time given. Old Zakum gave you an hour, old Chaos Zakum gave you nearly two(I think it was 1hr and 50mins). Horntail, and I believe Chaos, gives you two hours.

    Pink Bean? 30mins. Empress? 30mins. Hard Magnus? 30mins. Hell Gollux? 30mins. I'm sure you can see a pattern here. And that pattern would be Nexon Korea telling us that if you're not able to kill an end-game boss in less than half an hour, then what good are you?

    If they refused to get rid of timers, but bumped them up to an hour, it would substantially increase the amount of people who are able to do it. I don't give a rat's ass that ten people on any one given server can take down Damien in 15 minutes, there are more people playing than just that small group, substantially more, and it feels like they're ignored in favor of pandering to the whales whenever new content is shat out.
  • nenenenenenenenenene
    Reactions: 1,095
    Posts: 143
    Member
    edited October 2016
    Remove is one thing. Extending on a particular boss so you can beat is another. I hope you are more clear on what you are suggesting. Besides, you can't really ask them to officially encourage players to play non-stop while they constantly warns you that you shouldn't playing too long in one of those yellow in-game messages.
  • AKradianAKradian
    Reactions: 40,340
    Posts: 6,342
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    nenenenene

    Remove is one thing. Extending on a particular boss so you can beat is another. I hope you are more clear on what you are suggesting. Besides, you can't really ask them to officially encourage players to play non-stop while they constantly warns you that you shouldn't playing too long in one of those yellow in-game messages.
    I'm talking about removing, not extending.
    Back to the way it used to be before timers were introduced.
    A boss fight takes as long as it takes.
    What purpose does a timer serve, other than a paywall?

    As for encouraging players to play non-stop: feel free to suggest a "pause" button.
    The game is, and always has been, a grindfest that wants you to play 24/7. The newer training maps don't even have a safe spot to AFK for a minute or five. I don't think allowing players to stay in a boss map for over 30 minutes is any worse than that.
  • gamechangergamechanger
    Reactions: 3,460
    Posts: 506
    Member
    edited October 2016
    I am all for removing most timers, but not all of them. A very select amount of timers should remain in the game, and I do believe that Gollux Jewel is one of them. At that phase he has only 1 attack, which has a long cooldown for a boss. You only have to worry about this one attack, and downjumping to clear the trash mobs. This is one instance where the timer is adding real difficulty to the boss fight, because the mechanics aren't enough. But for the rest of the timers they should go (I'm torn on Dorothy, on one hand the whole point of ToZ is to do it within a certain time, on the other hand simply getting there in the time limit is enough of an achievement that I believe once you get there you shouldn't have to worry about time).

    Like you said @Akradian, these bosses are mechanically difficult, designed with the intention of killing you multiple times. If you can survive in those rooms for an hour then I fully believe you deserve the rewards for not dying and chipping away at them for an hour.
  • AKradianAKradian
    Reactions: 40,340
    Posts: 6,342
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    @gamechanger, the Gollux Jewel is the purest of DPS checks. It doesn't even pretend to be anything but a paywall. It should probably be removed from the game entirely, rather than just its timer.
  • BIackbeanBIackbean
    Reactions: 3,450
    Posts: 519
    Member
    edited October 2016
    no that takes way too long, then haxers would take advantage of this no timer thing, they can stay in boss and keep attacking til it dies.
  • AKradianAKradian
    Reactions: 40,340
    Posts: 6,342
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    BIackbean
    BIackbean said:

    no that takes way too long, then haxers would take advantage of this no timer thing, they can stay in boss and keep attacking til it dies.
    Hackers can kill bosses faster than legits.
  • NeospectorNeospector
    Reactions: 9,860
    Posts: 2,146
    Volunteer Forum Moderator
    edited October 2016
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    BIackbean
    BIackbean said:

    no that takes way too long, then haxers would take advantage of this no timer thing, they can stay in boss and keep attacking til it dies.
    Hackers can kill bosses faster than legits.
    They can also simply stop Magnus meteors from falling. So either they'd be rewarded for killing it quickly or rewarded for standing still. The former benefits hackers, and the latter benefits hackers and rewards people for not trying to beat the boss. I don't like either, but I much prefer the former.

    The game should reward partying, not standing around to get more stuff (and rewarding for killing things faster would probably have the opposite of its intended effect). If there's a DPS check then unfunded players should be able to beat that check by using a party. I get that you want to help unfunded players, but I don't think removing the timer is the way to do that, personally.
    CatoooloooVekilo
  • AKradianAKradian
    Reactions: 40,340
    Posts: 6,342
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    Neospector

    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    BIackbean
    BIackbean said:

    no that takes way too long, then haxers would take advantage of this no timer thing, they can stay in boss and keep attacking til it dies.
    Hackers can kill bosses faster than legits.
    They can also simply stop Magnus meteors from falling. So either they'd be rewarded for killing it quickly or rewarded for standing still. The former benefits hackers, and the latter benefits hackers and rewards people for not trying to beat the boss. I don't like either, but I much prefer the former.

    The game should reward partying, not standing around to get more stuff (and rewarding for killing things faster would probably have the opposite of its intended effect). If there's a DPS check then unfunded players should beat that check by using a party. I get that you want to help unfunded players, but I don't think removing the timer is the way to do that, personally.
    Problem is that parties can only go so far.
    6 unfunded people can't dish out the same damage as one superfunded one. And the bosses are tailored to the superfunded.
    This is only going to get worse with V and the removal of the damage cap.

    I am not suggesting higher rewards for taking longer. I'm suggesting the same rewards, no matter how long it takes.
  • AggraphineAggraphine
    Reactions: 19,415
    Posts: 3,553
    Member
    edited October 2016
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    Neospector

    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    BIackbean
    BIackbean said:

    no that takes way too long, then haxers would take advantage of this no timer thing, they can stay in boss and keep attacking til it dies.
    Hackers can kill bosses faster than legits.
    They can also simply stop Magnus meteors from falling. So either they'd be rewarded for killing it quickly or rewarded for standing still. The former benefits hackers, and the latter benefits hackers and rewards people for not trying to beat the boss. I don't like either, but I much prefer the former.

    The game should reward partying, not standing around to get more stuff (and rewarding for killing things faster would probably have the opposite of its intended effect). If there's a DPS check then unfunded players should beat that check by using a party. I get that you want to help unfunded players, but I don't think removing the timer is the way to do that, personally.
    Problem is that parties can only go so far.
    6 unfunded people can't dish out the same damage as one superfunded one. And the bosses are tailored to the superfunded.
    This is only going to get worse with V and the removal of the damage cap.

    I am not suggesting higher rewards for taking longer. I'm suggesting the same rewards, no matter how long it takes.
    You're suggesting a fair shot, for everyone, at getting the rewards for high-end bosses. Rather than having what is, in effect, a paywall from Empress and up.
  • NeospectorNeospector
    Reactions: 9,860
    Posts: 2,146
    Volunteer Forum Moderator
    edited October 2016
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    Neospector

    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    BIackbean
    BIackbean said:

    no that takes way too long, then haxers would take advantage of this no timer thing, they can stay in boss and keep attacking til it dies.
    Hackers can kill bosses faster than legits.
    They can also simply stop Magnus meteors from falling. So either they'd be rewarded for killing it quickly or rewarded for standing still. The former benefits hackers, and the latter benefits hackers and rewards people for not trying to beat the boss. I don't like either, but I much prefer the former.

    The game should reward partying, not standing around to get more stuff (and rewarding for killing things faster would probably have the opposite of its intended effect). If there's a DPS check then unfunded players should beat that check by using a party. I get that you want to help unfunded players, but I don't think removing the timer is the way to do that, personally.
    Problem is that parties can only go so far.
    6 unfunded people can't dish out the same damage as one superfunded one. And the bosses are tailored to the superfunded.
    This is only going to get worse with V and the removal of the damage cap.

    I am not suggesting higher rewards for taking longer. I'm suggesting the same rewards, no matter how long it takes.
    A party of 6 unfunded players can kill Empress, just like one funded player can. The point is to make it possible for unfunded players to upgrade their gear. If they can do that, they can build their way up to bosses like Damien or Lotus. You'd help unfunded players a lot more by providing ways to better their gear.

    And yes, you did at least suggest at one point higher rewards for taking longer:
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    On the contrary, I'd give better rewards if you managed to survive Hard Lotus for a day.
    Either way, you'd reduce the damage cap far more by giving incentive to party and making it easier to upgrade gear, not by making all bosses into competitions to determine who can use the most power elixirs (AKA "survive the longest").
  • AKradianAKradian
    Reactions: 40,340
    Posts: 6,342
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    Neospector

    And yes, you did at least suggest at one point higher rewards for taking longer:
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    On the contrary, I'd give better rewards if you managed to survive Hard Lotus for a day.
    Context is everything.
    I was saying that to counter Xenomata's suggestion of getting less rewards the longer you take.
    It's not something I think needs to be done, which is why it's not in my opening post.
    Neospector


    Either way, you'd reduce the damage cap far more by giving incentive to party and making it easier to upgrade gear, not by making all bosses into competitions to determine who can use the most power elixirs (AKA "survive the longest").
    Again, I'm not suggesting higher rewards for surviving longer.

    And in case you haven't noticed, survival at bosses is not about using the most power elixirs anymore. All the major bosses have 1HKO moves, potion cooldowns, and other mechanisms that require you to evade attacks. And you have to do all that while dealing damage.

    What purpose do boss timers serve, now that bosses are instanced?
  • XenomataXenomata
    Reactions: 2,595
    Posts: 287
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    Being rewarded for surviving Hard Lotus for a day sounds, to me at least, a lot like waiting X amount of time in order to have the boss drop things at ALL.
    Like what Horntail used to have, and what I think Magnus still has.
    Well whatever. I suggested that because I thought players still deserve some sort of "rewarding experience" but in retrospective the only reward people actually care about in the end are the equips or coins (in the case of Lotus and Damien). Reboot you might care about the meso.
    So there would need to be another non-gameplay beneficial reward that still gives you a sense of achievement, and I don't know if there really is anything like that that a player of maple would even care about. I dunno, discount on Star Force/Spell Trace usage for a day if you clear Lotus in X amount of time?
  • AKradianAKradian
    Reactions: 40,340
    Posts: 6,342
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    Xenomata
    Xenomata said:

    Being rewarded for surviving Hard Lotus for a day sounds, to me at least, a lot like waiting X amount of time in order to have the boss drop things at ALL.
    Like what Horntail used to have, and what I think Magnus still has.
    Well whatever. I suggested that because I thought players still deserve some sort of "rewarding experience" but in retrospective the only reward people actually care about in the end are the equips or coins (in the case of Lotus and Damien). Reboot you might care about the meso.
    So there would need to be another non-gameplay beneficial reward that still gives you a sense of achievement, and I don't know if there really is anything like that that a player of maple would even care about. I dunno, discount on Star Force/Spell Trace usage for a day if you clear Lotus in X amount of time?
    Why do the rewards need to be any different based on how long it took?
    You beat the boss, you get the exp and the drops.
    Doesn't matter if it took you five minutes or five hours, it's the same exp and the same drops. And whatever sense of accomplishment you feel.
  • SorrowSorrow
    Reactions: 2,780
    Posts: 314
    Member, Private Tester
    edited October 2016
    I love the idea, it would give players that don't necessarily have high range a fighting chance at end-game content. It might even encourage guilds to do boss raids without having to be 2m-2m range.
    Vekilo
  • NeospectorNeospector
    Reactions: 9,860
    Posts: 2,146
    Volunteer Forum Moderator
    edited October 2016
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    Neospector

    And yes, you did at least suggest at one point higher rewards for taking longer:
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    On the contrary, I'd give better rewards if you managed to survive Hard Lotus for a day.
    Context is everything.
    I was saying that to counter Xenomata's suggestion of getting less rewards the longer you take.
    It's not something I think needs to be done, which is why it's not in my opening post.
    Neospector


    Either way, you'd reduce the damage cap far more by giving incentive to party and making it easier to upgrade gear, not by making all bosses into competitions to determine who can use the most power elixirs (AKA "survive the longest").
    Again, I'm not suggesting higher rewards for surviving longer.

    And in case you haven't noticed, survival at bosses is not about using the most power elixirs anymore. All the major bosses have 1HKO moves, potion cooldowns, and other mechanisms that require you to evade attacks. And you have to do all that while dealing damage.

    What purpose do boss timers serve, now that bosses are instanced?
    The purpose they serve is making it so that you don't just tank your way through (I.E. survive the longest), and to prevent you from just wasting time. Why does Tengu have a time limit? He requires no funding whatsoever to beat, but the timer is there to prevent people from just wasting time.
    It would be far more effective to reduce the damage cap by making it easier to be unfunded, not by giving them unlimited time and hoping they don't get frustrated enough to just ragequit after an hour and only having chipped away a quarter of Lotus's health.
  • Mallow256Mallow256
    Reactions: 1,060
    Posts: 69
    Member
    edited October 2016
    Neospector

    The purpose they serve is making it so that you don't just tank your way through (I.E. survive the longest), and to prevent you from just wasting time. Why does Tengu have a time limit? He requires no funding whatsoever to beat, but the timer is there to prevent people from just wasting time.
    It would be far more effective to reduce the damage cap by making it easier to be unfunded, not by giving them unlimited time and hoping they don't get frustrated enough to just ragequit after an hour and only having chipped away a quarter of Lotus's health.
    Why bring up Tengu when he is clearly a special circumstance?

    I would, at the very least, like timers to be extended if not outright removed for non special-case bosses. Not having a timer opens up the possibility of players forming a party to take on bosses that are much stronger than them and still possibly pull out the win if they are skilled enough to live for an extended period of time. Now thats party play.

  • gamechangergamechanger
    Reactions: 3,460
    Posts: 506
    Member
    edited October 2016
    AKradian
    AKradian said:

    @gamechanger, the Gollux Jewel is the purest of DPS checks. It doesn't even pretend to be anything but a paywall. It should probably be removed from the game entirely, rather than just its timer.
    I recognize that, but I still don't have a problem with the way it is implemented. Unlike other bosses, pretty much the only mechanic at all at the Gollux jewel phase is the DPS check. Its not much of a mechanic, but its all the phase has except for the trash mobs. I do also think that Gollux in particular is a special case because of the fact that he has 4 true difficulties, and that no matter what difficulty you fight, you can work your way towards his better gear. No other boss is like that. Right now I can't support removing the DPS check at the gollux jewel phase, but I can support increasing the timer as you face the higher difficulties that Gollux has (say, 20 extra seconds per difficulty level, resulting in an extra minute on the timer when fighting Hellux). For the other bosses though, I support removing the timer (and on Gollux himself too, remove the 28(?) min time limit)