[New Users] Please note that all new users need to be approved before posting. This process can take up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.
Check out the v.256 - The Dark Ride: Limbo Patch Notes
here!
Closed A list of complaints about the code of conduct
Comments
Its no secret that Old MS is one of my favorite topics but I would remind everyone to try to stay on the current topic.
http://company.nexon.com/Eng/Contactus/Inquiries/Businessinquiries/Business.aspx
That link is to the business inquiries page on the English version of Nexon Korea's site. Wanting to know if Nexon would consider making a legacy server sure sounds like a business inquiry. You said you wanted an answer from Nexon, so go ahead and make an inquiry, and for the love of all that is holy please leave the forums alone.
Edit: Bold for emphasis since this is my last post on the matter.
You are correct, up until that last month it was mostly civil. A few people were getting annoyed before then, but it was kept civil for the most part. But I do think that you miss your analogy.
If once or twice a month someone posts the same topic, its usually answered in a polite yet curt way, with someone eventually telling the OP or giving them a link to the older discussions. That's fine, its something that happens on forums because its just not feasible to go through and search every thread before making a new one. Its fine if it is different people making those topics. But when the same person starts spamming the same topic at a fast rate (doesn't matter who, doesn't matter what topic), they know beforehand that there are already posts on the same topic on the forum. They know exactly how many there are, and what type of reactions their post will receive. So when they continue to do so after getting increasingly negative reactions it is a problem and needs to be shut down. Again the topic does not matter. You can see the same thing starting with Daxterbeer and the AO discussion right now (well its been going on a while really). He's been fairly slow about bringing it up over and over but it is getting spammy, and it is also starting to leave a sour taste in people's mouths. If he isn't careful he will wind up in a situation where even people who do support AO are tired of seeing the same discussion with the same negativity/hostility and start to speak out against the threads as well for their own sanity.
NTD did not stop posting as soon as some would like, and so now there are a few people who seem to have decided to permanently hate him (which is unfortunate, but I do understand a little bit).
Simply put, if another player is breaking a forum rule then the thing to do is make a report.
If not and the other player is not breaking any rules at that moment, raging against them is baseless and solves nothing. Just because people have differences of opinion on something (even on how long to pursue a question) those differences are not an excuse to turn hostile. That is my thinking in any case. No one is being forced to click on and read threads that they do not want to.
You have made 13 posts since coming over to the new forums, not a single one of them has been unrelated to old maple. Are you trolling at this point? Or are you just woefully oblivious?
[2013-10-21 11:27:11 PM] Waltzing: The biggest concerns are development costs and server costs, and if the number of subscriptions (P2P) or Cash Shop sales (F2P) would actually make it worthwhile..
[2013-10-21 11:27:36 PM] Maryse: Yeah, pay to play will most likely be a must
[2013-10-21 11:29:21 PM] Waltzing: The question is then would it even be updated, or would it pretty much be stagnant except for bug fixes and hack blocks, maybe some old events. For example, the Project OMS guy wants areas released after Big Bang.
[2013-10-21 11:29:37 PM] Waltzing: Which is a big chunk of development cost and QA cost.
[2013-10-21 11:29:57 PM] Maryse: hmmm
[2013-10-21 11:29:58 PM] Maryse: Yeah
[2013-10-21 11:30:10 PM] Waltzing: Not so much naysaying as bringing up the big concerns.
[2013-10-21 11:30:30 PM] Maryse: I'm sure it'd be fine if it was just strictly pre-BB
[2013-10-21 11:30:54 PM] Maryse: I don't understand why you'd want a pre-BB server but still have the latest maps?
[2013-10-21 11:31:08 PM] Waltzing: There's also the question of which version to use, since everybody who wants a pre-BB server has a different idea about that.
[2013-10-21 11:31:19 PM] Maryse: Yeah
[2013-10-21 11:31:22 PM] Maryse: Some people want before pirates
[2013-10-21 11:31:23 PM] Waltzing: They want Chryse, for example.
[2013-10-21 11:31:32 PM] Maryse: others just want literally before Big bang
[2013-10-21 11:31:38 PM] Waltzing: Old maps stay the same, but add new areas.
[2013-10-21 11:31:41 PM] Waltzingz: Yeah.
[2013-10-21 11:32:15 PM] Waltzing: The v92 crew often forgets that Potential was out for months before Big Bang, as were Dual Blades.
This is the closest we got from a "staff answer".
Everyone knows how many posts you've made in the past regarding this same subject, and this is why the rule exists. You're just blind and don't see it.
Jagex went a step further and just did a referendum themselves to gauge support for 2007 servers.
No, really?
Do you for one second believe Nexon takes their users more seriously than potential business partners?
Do you actually think that the people who respond to forum posts or tickets have more decision-making authority, as well as knowledge of the company's vision and plans, than the people handling business contacts?
What kind of world do you live in?
You keep evading practical suggestions because all you want to do is talk about Old Maple. And if that's not allowed, then talk about the rule forbidding talking about Old Maple. And if that gets banned, then talking about the rule forbidding talking about the rule forbidding...
Y.K.
There is no reason to assume it is going anywhere.
You got an answer to that when you made your first post on these forums.
But no, you're not willing to accept that answer, so you keep pushing for another one.
People are trying to help you with your obsession by offering you a direct point of contact with Nexon. So you won't have to spam the forums where no answer has been given in years and none is likely to ever be given, and the topic was banned to boot.
And your response to that is "why would Nexon respond to their business contact page when they don't respond to tickets?"
I find that response absurd and that is what I am "rambling on about."
The rule was just re-confirmed less than a month ago. How is it out-of-date?
When I made a legacy thread about a month ago, I stated that the rules had been "ninja changed" to clarify that, I meant the rules had been adjusted sometime after I initially finished the thread creation process and not that anyone had purposefully changed them to stop the thread. It was most likely an unfortunate coincidence and me jumping to conclusions and getting my hopes up.
Anyway if you re-read the first post of this thread you should be able to grasp what I am writing about. The rule was not made good, the basis for the rule is faulty and it does not do much except encourage undesirable behavior. Unless you somehow don't care about the "police" ignoring you when you try to explain yourself? Which is something I think that just about anybody should be able to relate to.