Again, to make such a drastic change, there must be compelling evidence that such change will affect the game, for the better in terms of the long haul.
You can repeat slogans and "… (more)majority" all you want, but large scale changes must be proven to work for the future of the game, not just because 20 people want it.
To put into perspective with this "majority" collective thinking, during the Salem Witch Trials, it was collectively thought that it would be ok to burn women out of fear that they were witches. That was what the majority wanted.
So, prove to Nexon that these changes "will be for the better" with precise detail, as if youre pitching a business plan, projections for the coming years etc, and if your evidence is convincing, it may get attention you want it to get.
and there is no such thing as social justice, justice is justice, it needs no modifier. (less)
tomorrow will be Compensation will be given for the Nebulite Decent Skills.
Note: Compensation will be for 14 Nodestones instead of 140 Nodestone Fragments, due to technical limitations
well at least its something but it is way too little compare to the original promised amount.
14 nodes has the potential to be more than 140 node shards.
140 node shards is basically just 2 crafted boost nodes maybe almost a skill node, but 14 nodes can be 14 special nodes which is 50 shards per, etc, that probability is low but you get what I'm trying to say, even if you get 10 boost nodes and 4 skill nodes you still get more than the 140 shards.
better yet, to put into perspective, it takes 35 fragments to make a node, so 140/ 35 = 4 crafted nodes. (less)
Why on the forums, we already know the distribution of players on the forum that will vote yes. The poll/voting has already been explained that it isn't accurate or can become skewed when … (more)there isn't a large enough sample size to ask. There aren't a lot of players that use the forum.
Another mistake in your poll is that youre lumping merge and transfer into a yes or no question, which further skews the yes from the no because if someone votes no to a merge but yes to a transfer, there's no option for them to vote transfer, so they'll vote no, or if they do vote yes, itll be like theyre voting to either a merge or a transfer, which skews the results as well.
Mega Burninator and Mega Burning are two different burning events. You only get one mega burning from the ongoing event, and the mega burninator is from the ark microsite sharing event, … (more)which had issues, so those that didn't use it, got another one. You can have two active burning characters, but only one from each event is provided. (less)
Maybe we could try going down to 3 or 4 worlds first and see how it is.
4 world solution is easy:
Bera
Scania
Windia
"The rest"
Reboot
3 world solution has some options:
Bera
Scania
Windia
Then fill in the remaining to Scania and Windia. Depending on how full/empty those two are it could be all three of grazed bacon broni added to windia
Or maybe grazed and bacon added to windia and broni added to scania..... Etc.
You see? if DarkPassenger agrees with you, then your idea is not a good idea, lol.
3 worlds? Bera, Scania, Windia (and then Reboot as well, so 4 in total)
This is a very bad idea, why?
Take a look at all those empty worlds right now.... they're wayyyy too dead and empty.
So let's say that Bera will be the most active world, Scania and Windia will still be and stay as ghost towns as before (maybe just a little bit better than now, but still bad).
This is exactly why DarkPassenger agrees with you.
Also, it doesn't make that much of sense, why? hear me out.
Very few people want an empty server.
The majority want as many people as possible.
What do you see here? 2 type of people, right?
So why 3 worlds? (without Reboot)
What we need are 2 worlds.
Bera for those who want as many people as possible
And Windia or Scania for those who want an empty and dead server. in that server they'd be able to stay alone, exactly as they wished, no smegas, spams, ksers, etc.
And the last 3rd world would be Reboot.
So in total, 3 worlds, Bera, Windia, and Reboot, this is the only and the best solution you could ever come up with.
And remember, if DarkPassenger agrees with anyone, it means it's a very very bad idea, it really seems as if DarkPassenger is a real GM from Nexon (since we all understand that Nexon Does NOT want to merge worlds AT ALL! why? who knows....)
Im saying the way he presents the ideas is how it should be done. And to discredit his ideas because you think I agree with them, whether I do or not, on behalf of your personal feelings of dislike for me, well that's rather petty and toxic. This isn't reddit.
See, rallying up based on personal bias on who is saying what rather than what is being said, well that's concerning. This isn't politics where a slogan will get things done. to change something so drastic in a game, there must be convincing evidence as to why that change will result for the better, disregarding any personal wants and feelings, to portray a bigger picture thatll result from the change. But these behaviors are a bit elementary.
and again, don't throw out stupid claims that I'm from nexon or a GM, or I use multiple accounts to support my opinions. Thatll get me and everyone involved investigated, especially without any evidence. Why should they take you seriously, when youre saying nonsense like this?
lastly, exactly what makes you the expert on ideas or what are your credentials to determine what are good ideas or bad ideas based on what gathers support or not? Stop trying to make things personal, this is just a game.
