dont want to get sidetracked on this but had to correct you, with all due respect.
Objectively speaking, nonetheless, Nexon did good with removing duped/hacked items, doesnt matter what level the people were, how much they spent on the game, they showed no bias and did their job.
Key word "usually." Almost all of the cases invoking that law are ones in which defendant colluded with the thief, was profiting from selling, or bought a high profile item which I suppose you can liken to the argument. I would say it's more analogous to purchasing items from hacked players in which there is no penalty for.
I get irked at the fact that people are focusing on dopes who buy dupes and get screwed over and not the hackers who profit from duping since they win no matter what happens to them in game. Hopefully dupe removals can come sooner to mitigate damage if that already isn't the case. (less)
