엘소드

ZephyrusSpring wrote: »

Have you guys heard of Devil's advocate? It's when you intentionally play the opposite side of a debate to promote deeper thinking about the topic. Backing out and saying "I don't need to justify my decision to you" isn't very thought provoking.

Topic is titled "Who isn't transferring to Bera", not "Why are/aren't you transferring to Bera". Nothing in the topic title or opening post by the topic creator asked for your thought as to why you are or aren't moving.

If you want to play devil's advocate, do so in the appropriate discussion/debate topic. TC made it clear that this topic is to count who's moving or not in post #8.

You know, people say a lot of things; doesn't mean they'll do it.
Like New Years Resolutions.

Fuschia wrote: »

tl'dr

all I see is "me, me, me, me.", no other constructive, well thought out explanation as to why this game is turning bad, which it is.

Didn't know you had to type up an essay if you wanted to make a topic on the forums.

It's his topic, as long as it's placed in the correct subforum, he can post anything he damn well pleases (provided it follows the ToS/Code of Conduct).

Oh... you mean the lie detector item that was eventually removed because the majority of people abused it to grief and steal maps.

The community can't be trusted to police itself when provided the tools, so the ball was taken home because of it. If you play Combat Arms, it's no different from Elite Mod players kicking you from the room because you killed them too much.

Albinorock wrote: »

Yup. This is how Nexon handles their false bans.
"We detected something with your account and we refuse (they say they can't tell you but they can) to tell you what it is because we're lazy to actually look into this."
This company is disgusting.

Yet you applied for Tespia. Man, the ironing is dillish.