Aggraphine

I like this hair. Too bad it's green.

LF> event with hair color/mix dye coupons

Why exactly do they deserve another chance? Are 24 previous chances not sufficient for you?

If Nexon won't answer on the forums and not in a ticket then why would a business inquiry be any different? Besides, this thread is not about a legacy server but it is about the unfairness of the related rule in the code of conduct.

Here's a snippet of a conversation I had with Waltzing THREE YEARS AGO:

[2013-10-21 11:27:11 PM] Waltzing: The biggest concerns are development costs and server costs, and if the number of subscriptions (P2P) or Cash Shop sales (F2P) would actually make it worthwhile..
[2013-10-21 11:27:36 PM] Maryse: Yeah, pay to play will most likely be a must
[2013-10-21 11:29:21 PM] Waltzing: The question is then would it even be updated, or would it pretty much be stagnant except for bug fixes and hack blocks, maybe some old events. For example, the Project OMS guy wants areas released after Big Bang.
[2013-10-21 11:29:37 PM] Waltzing: Which is a big chunk of development cost and QA cost.
[2013-10-21 11:29:57 PM] Maryse: hmmm
[2013-10-21 11:29:58 PM] Maryse: Yeah
[2013-10-21 11:30:10 PM] Waltzing: Not so much naysaying as bringing up the big concerns.
[2013-10-21 11:30:30 PM] Maryse: I'm sure it'd be fine if it was just strictly pre-BB
[2013-10-21 11:30:54 PM] Maryse: I don't understand why you'd want a pre-BB server but still have the latest maps?
[2013-10-21 11:31:08 PM] Waltzing: There's also the question of which version to use, since everybody who wants a pre-BB server has a different idea about that.
[2013-10-21 11:31:19 PM] Maryse: Yeah
[2013-10-21 11:31:22 PM] Maryse: Some people want before pirates
[2013-10-21 11:31:23 PM] Waltzing: They want Chryse, for example.
[2013-10-21 11:31:32 PM] Maryse: others just want literally before Big bang
[2013-10-21 11:31:38 PM] Waltzing: Old maps stay the same, but add new areas.
[2013-10-21 11:31:41 PM] Waltzingz: Yeah.
[2013-10-21 11:32:15 PM] Waltzing: The v92 crew often forgets that Potential was out for months before Big Bang, as were Dual Blades.

This is the closest we got from a "staff answer".

You do realize that I am the same NTD from the old forum right? I'm not sure why this was posted in a thread about an unfair rule.

The only reason you, and only you if you haven't noticed, think it's unfair is because it effectively makes you unable to post anything, since that's all you seem able to talk about.

You won't shut your gob about old maple, even with a rule in place explicitly because of you. How do you not see that you and your incessant pursuit of a legacy server(don't bullshit me, we all know that's what you want, and why you keep whining about how "unfair" the rule banning the talk of it is) is what's causing hostility and making people mad?

You have made 13 posts since coming over to the new forums, not a single one of them has been unrelated to old maple. Are you trolling at this point? Or are you just woefully oblivious?

Are you still sore that you spammed so damned many old maple threads that it was made against the rules to make them at all?

Get over it, and yourself while you're at it.

(Any complaints about my complaints or off topic posts will be reported. If you would like to complain about something then I would say make your own thread)

"Anyone who disagrees with me is not allowed to post or I'll go cry to the moderators!"

That's not how this works, boyo.

You still don't understand why old maple threads are not allowed? You can't see the forest for the trees. You can't see that your incessant spam-like posting of so many threads revolving around the same matter is what caused the addendum to the rules to come into existence. And I firmly believe that, at this point, you never will.

No, disagreeing is fine if the person has something to add. Although I cannot fathom why anyone would disagree with the OP of this thread

You can't fathom why anyone would disagree with the OP(you) of this thread? That's beyond apparent. You "couldn't fathom" why every single one of your multiple concurrent threads on the old forums were so rife with hostility. Your inability to "fathom" what people are saying is the source of both the hostility toward you and your threads, as well as the rule forbidding the creation of old maple threads. Yet you continue to act as though it does not apply to you. You make threads that skirt around the issue, but are so pointedly obvious that it's trivial to read between the lines and find exactly what you're getting at.

You want to know what I can't fathom? How anyone could be so blind as to not see that no one is interested in what they have to offer.