Because he didn't steal the nomination from his fellow Republican opponents.
Because he doesn't have strong ties to a child sex trafficking ring. That's morally reprehensible. It's also pretty morally reprehensible to be shilling so hard for the Clintons. How can you live with yourself? Well it doesn't matter because if she indeed does win you won't be living very long. Global thermonuclear war tends to kill pretty quickly in most simulations.
Because he didn't steal the nomination from his fellow Republican opponents.
Because he doesn't have strong ties to a child sex trafficking ring. That's morally reprehensible. It's also pretty morally reprehensible to be shilling so hard for the Clintons. How can you live with yourself? Well it doesn't matter because if she indeed does win you won't be living very long. Global thermonuclear war tends to kill pretty quickly in most simulations.
so let me get this straight just because Hillary HAPPENS to be a wife of sex maniac like Bill you would rather vote for Trump who WANTS WAR IN MEDDLE EAST? And create another Iraq war? I am glad America is not made up with people like you... There are people like in this forum:https://forums.sufficientvelocity.com/threads/2016-general-election-megathread-clinton-v-trump.28703/page-788#post-7188231 who strongly disperses Trump for what he REALLY is- a man so full of himself that he thinks he can do anything.
Because he didn't steal the nomination from his fellow Republican opponents.
Because he doesn't have strong ties to a child sex trafficking ring. That's morally reprehensible. It's also pretty morally reprehensible to be shilling so hard for the Clintons. How can you live with yourself? Well it doesn't matter because if she indeed does win you won't be living very long. Global thermonuclear war tends to kill pretty quickly in most simulations.
so let me get this straight just because Hillary HAPPENS to be a wife of sex maniac like Bill you would rather vote for Trump who WANTS WAR IN MEDDLE EAST? And create another Iraq war?
did you even read that link? that had nothing to do with Bill. That has everything to do with the Hillary and her close connection to Ms Silsby. Are you doing this on purpose?
Trump doesn't want war in the Middle East. The war is already there. Every action he is proposing is something in the hopes of ending the war quickly, instead of prolonging it. Clinton wants a lengthy war not only in the Middle East, but with Russia as well. How is that better than Trump?
Because he didn't steal the nomination from his fellow Republican opponents.
Because he doesn't have strong ties to a child sex trafficking ring. That's morally reprehensible. It's also pretty morally reprehensible to be shilling so hard for the Clintons. How can you live with yourself? Well it doesn't matter because if she indeed does win you won't be living very long. Global thermonuclear war tends to kill pretty quickly in most simulations.
so let me get this straight just because Hillary HAPPENS to be a wife of sex maniac like Bill you would rather vote for Trump who WANTS WAR IN MEDDLE EAST? And create another Iraq war?
did you even read that link? that had nothing to do with Bill. That has everything to do with the Hillary and her close connection to Ms Silsby. Are you doing this on purpose?
Trump doesn't want war in the Middle East. The war is already there. Every action he is proposing is something in the hopes of ending the war quickly, instead of prolonging it. Clinton wants a lengthy war not only in the Middle East, but with Russia as well. How is that better than Trump?
sorry, archive.is isn't functioning properly with that article so I can't read it.
Said he would force the military to commit war crimes Proposed to create a database system to track Muslims in the U.S. Advocated assassinating terrorists’ families Urged supporters to beat up protesters at his rallies Promised to deport U.S. citizens whose parents immigrated illegally, in violation of the 14th Amendment Called for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. Suggested the U.S. should reduce its debts by partially defaulting on them Doesn’t know how many articles are in the Constitution Doesn’t pay his bills Praised North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un Named and threatened former students who criticized Trump University Refused to rule out using nuclear weapons against ISIS Suggested that he might refuse to serve as president if elected Hired a suspicious number of advisers who have done work on behalf of Vladimir Putin Praised the U.K.’s vote to leave the EU because a falling pound would be good for his Scottish golf course Said that the U.S. military should withdraw from Japan and South Korea and allow those countries to defend themselves with nuclear weapons ( and that is despite both of these countries being a member ofAnti-nuclear organisations ) Believes the world would be “100 percent” better if Saddam Hussein and Muammar Qaddafi were still in power Proposed to have China assassinate Kim Jong-un (which is likely as America handing Aleska back to Russia for free) Referred to 9/11 as 7-Eleven
He didn't say he would "force the military to commit war crimes". He recognizes the fact that families of terrorists are complicit in the activities of terrorists, and need to be dealt with accordingly. That does not necessarily mean death, although I guess under extreme circumstances that might have to be an option. Under your moral busy-body attitude, you would say these wonderful upstanding members of society should be left alone by our soldiers.
"Proposed to create a database system to track Muslims in the U.S."? LMAO, newsflash, this system already exists. next.
"Advocated assassinating terrorists’ families"? see point 1
"Urged supporters to beat up protesters at his rallies"? How about the Clinton Campaign paying mentally ill people to instigate violence, as shown in the O'Keefe videos?
"Promised to deport U.S. citizens whose parents immigrated illegally, in violation of the 14th Amendment"? The 14th Amendment that was only meant to apply to the newly-freed slaves, and which has been grossly misused by legislating-from-the-bench justices for all kinds of progressive agendas? Yeah sorry, anchor babies aren't citizens.
"Called for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S." ONLY UNTIL WE CAN GET A HOLD ON EVERYTHING AND CREATE A SYSTEM THAT CAN PROPERLY VET IMMIGRANTS.
"Doesn’t know how many articles are in the Constitution" A small mixup between articles and Amendments, when speaking off-the-cuff rather than from a teleprompter. mountain out of a molehill.
"Doesn’t pay his bills" Doesn't pay full price to contractors who don't hold up their end of the deal.
"Hired a suspicious number of advisers who have done work on behalf of Vladimir Putin"
"Praised the U.K.’s vote to leave the EU because a falling pound would be good for his Scottish golf course" He praised the E.U. referendum's outcome because it's a reclamation of sovereignty. Deal with it.
"Said that the U.S. military should withdraw from Japan and South Korea and allow those countries to defend themselves with nuclear weapons ( and that is despite both of these countries being a member ofAnti-nuclear organisations ) " And they were forced into it shortly after WWII. These nations see American military presence as stifling. Removal will grant them more sovereignty. You hate freedom don't you?
"Proposed to have China assassinate Kim Jong-un (which is likely as America handing Aleska back to Russia for free) " Not even close. I already explained this one to you a few pages back.
"Referred to 9/11 as 7-Eleven" Wow you're right. That makes him LITERALLY HITLER. Better let western civilization collapse over a freudian slip. It's 2016 after all.
How about instead of regurgitating poorly-constructed arguments from your favorite filthy globalist rags (word for word), you actually grow the agency to formulate your own arguments?
And they were forced into it shortly after WWII. These nations see American military presence as stifling. Removal will grant them more sovereignty. You hate freedom don't you?
not really the cold hard fact is that in order to combat large number of North Korean army South Korea NEEDS American forces! South Korea has its own forces but the numbers are small compared to North... which has 3rd largest army in the world... next to America and China. Even though North may have poor equipment the sheer number makes up for it through zerg rush tactics and is enough to capture most major cities in the northern part of South Korea like Incheon and Soul. American forces are there just as a safety measure so that if North Attacks South they will have to attack American forces which in turn brings America into the battle! North KNOWS this and is why they are not attacking South.
And they were forced into it shortly after WWII. These nations see American military presence as stifling. Removal will grant them more sovereignty. You hate freedom don't you?
not really the cold hard fact is that in order to combat large number of North Korean army South Korea NEEDS American forces! South Korea has its own forces but the numbers are small compared to North... which has 3rd largest army in the world... next to America and China. Even though North may have poor equipment the sheer number makes up for it through zerg rush tactics and is enough to capture most major cities in the northern part of South Korea like Incheon and Soul. American forces are there just as a safety measure so that if North Attacks South they will have to attack American forces which in turn brings America into the battle! North KNOWS this and is why they are not attacking South. I really doubt 28,500 American troops is really what is holding off the North Korean attack. I think it has much more to do with the half-million active-duty South Koreans.
For attention no doubt, only an a-moral sociopath would be able to look past what Trump has said and done.... No one in the right mind should be supporting a man going on trial in December for the rape of a child.
And they were forced into it shortly after WWII. These nations see American military presence as stifling. Removal will grant them more sovereignty. You hate freedom don't you?
not really the cold hard fact is that in order to combat large number of North Korean army South Korea NEEDS American forces! South Korea has its own forces but the numbers are small compared to North... which has 3rd largest army in the world... next to America and China. Even though North may have poor equipment the sheer number makes up for it through zerg rush tactics and is enough to capture most major cities in the northern part of South Korea like Incheon and Soul. American forces are there just as a safety measure so that if North Attacks South they will have to attack American forces which in turn brings America into the battle! North KNOWS this and is why they are not attacking South.
you know how many active soldiers North Korea have? 1,190,000 Active personnel how many soldiers south have? Active personnel 630,000 yeah... Even if they have 1960's equipment the sheet number can be used as "zerg rush" to overwhelm South Korea and gain important early victory in several key cities that are located close to North... heck even capital of South is located just few kilometres down the border between North and South! And North KNOWS about this. the number of American soldiers are not really that important but the fact that they are there and the fact that should North attack South they have to attack American soldier is really important fact here.
For attention no doubt, only an a-moral sociopath would be able to look past what Trump has said and done.... No one in the right mind should be supporting a man going on trial in December for the rape of a child.
Trump won't be going on trial in December. SDNY automatically issues an order scheduling a status conference when a complaint is filed without even looking at the complaint. That's the "court date" that you are talking about. Trump hasn't even been served with the complaint yet -- or, if he has, Doe's counsel hasn't filed proof of service under FRCP 4(j).
you know how many active soldiers North Korea have? 1,190,000 Active personnel how many soldiers south have? Active personnel 630,000 yeah... Even if they have 1960's equipment the sheet number can be used as "zerg rush" to overwhelm South Korea and gain important early victory in several key cities that are located close to North... heck even capital of South is located just few kilometres down the border between North and South! And North KNOWS about this. the number of American soldiers are not really that important but the fact that they are there and the fact that should North attack South they have to attack American soldier is really important fact here.
I'm sure that will work out quite swimmingly. Just like how we protected Vietnam from the communists. Oh wait we didn't.
For attention no doubt, only an a-moral sociopath would be able to look past what Trump has said and done.... No one in the right mind should be supporting a man going on trial in December for the rape of a child.
Trump won't be going on trial in December. SDNY automatically issues an order scheduling a status conference when a complaint is filed without even looking at the complaint. That's the "court date" that you are talking about. Trump hasn't even been served with the complaint yet -- or, if he has, Doe's counsel hasn't filed proof of service under FRCP 4(j).
you know how many active soldiers North Korea have? 1,190,000 Active personnel how many soldiers south have? Active personnel 630,000 yeah... Even if they have 1960's equipment the sheet number can be used as "zerg rush" to overwhelm South Korea and gain important early victory in several key cities that are located close to North... heck even capital of South is located just few kilometres down the border between North and South! And North KNOWS about this. the number of American soldiers are not really that important but the fact that they are there and the fact that should North attack South they have to attack American soldier is really important fact here.
I'm sure that will work out quite swimmingly. Just like how we protected Vietnam from the communists. Oh wait we didn't.
South Korea=/=Veitnam. Seriously What makes you think South Korea is anything like Vietnam American soldier is there to remind Kim family that "hey don't mess with this little guy... you mess with him, you mess with me! got it!" America lost Vietnam because 1, they were NOT familiar with Vietnam jungle terran... which is NOT present in any part of Korea 2. America had bad press in South Vietman because of its support on unpopular leader while north Vietnam leader Ho chi minh had almost univeral support from all vietnam which is NOT the case in South Korea. Many people in South Korea actually have postive opinion on America as a nation.. and almost all Koreans hate Kim family regiom... no sane koreans would support North... while in Vietnam war many Southern Vietnamese people suppiorted Ho Chi Minh. False equalance much?
just to let everyone know how TERRIBLE Trump is at debating. "MY VOICE IS LOUD SO I AM RIGHT!" oh and video comments on how Hillary used Trump's weakness against him. And to that I say... well done! That is what politician SHOULD be doing... be shewed and clever! You can't win a game of politics just by being "knight of justice" and just by "playing it fair" Also kinda funny how Trump supporters are being silent about all three debates... if Trump did well it SHOULD be all over here now...
just to let everyone know how TERRIBLE Trump is at debating. "MY VOICE IS LOUD SO I AM RIGHT!" oh and video comments on how Hillary used Trump's weakness against him. And to that I say... well done! That is what politician SHOULD be doing... be shewed and clever! You can't win a game of politics just by being "knight of justice" and just by "playing it fair" Also kinda funny how Trump supporters are being silent about all three debates... if Trump did well it SHOULD be all over here now...
WRONG! NOT A PUPPET NOT A PUPPET! ---
It's just an election of false equivalencies spun for the Media.
Trump Sexually abusing women = Being married to Bill Clinton
Calling all Mexicans Rapist, Drug Dealers and saying you'll ban all muslims = Calling out Trump supports for being racist
Being on Putin's **** = emails
Trumps' Fraud that he's going on trial this Month = The Clinton Foundation (which, btw is ranked higher than the Red Cross for aid relief, and truly is an amazing Foundation)
Seriously tho, this election won't even be close, there's a reason why we have the Electoral College. It's to stop idiots from voting in a Jackass. And Arlong, as I stated before, only amoral sociopaths can look past what Trump has said/done. So if you are just doing this for attention, you'll get no more from me or if you truly are an amoral sociopath, I have no intention of speaking to you further anyways...
Besides how could anyone want that hideous flabby, orange-skin, small handed monstrosity as the face of the greatest country in the world? Did you see how red his face turned during the debates? How would anyone take him seriously?
just to let everyone know how TERRIBLE Trump is at debating. "MY VOICE IS LOUD SO I AM RIGHT!" oh and video comments on how Hillary used Trump's weakness against him. And to that I say... well done! That is what politician SHOULD be doing... be shewed and clever! You can't win a game of politics just by being "knight of justice" and just by "playing it fair" Also kinda funny how Trump supporters are being silent about all three debates... if Trump did well it SHOULD be all over here now...
WRONG! NOT A PUPPET NOT A PUPPET! ---
It's just an election of false equivalencies spun for the Media.
Trump Sexually abusing women = Being married to Bill Clinton
Calling all Mexicans Rapist, Drug Dealers and saying you'll ban all muslims = Calling out Trump supports for being racist
Being on Putin's **** = emails
Trumps' Fraud that he's going on trial this Month = The Clinton Foundation (which, btw is ranked higher than the Red Cross for aid relief, and truly is an amazing Foundation)
Seriously tho, this election won't even be close, there's a reason why we have the Electoral College. It's to stop idiots from voting in a Jackass. And Arlong, as I stated before, only amoral sociopaths can look past what Trump has said/done. So if you are just doing this for attention, you'll get no more from me or if you truly are an amoral sociopath, I have no intention of speaking to you further anyways...
Besides how could anyone want that hideous flabby, orange-skin, small handed monstrosity as the face of the greatest country in the world? Did you see how red his face turned during the debates? How would anyone take him seriously?
that is all nice and all but why did you quote me?
OK all - If you want political discourse, please move it to another forum that isn't Nexon related. Thank you for the 50 pages, but this is bordering across too many lines now within our forum rules.
Also, make sure you get out and vote, regardless of your preference.
Comments
Because he doesn't have strong ties to a child sex trafficking ring. That's morally reprehensible. It's also pretty morally reprehensible to be shilling so hard for the Clintons. How can you live with yourself?
Well it doesn't matter because if she indeed does win you won't be living very long. Global thermonuclear war tends to kill pretty quickly in most simulations.
I am glad America is not made up with people like you...
There are people like in this forum:https://forums.sufficientvelocity.com/threads/2016-general-election-megathread-clinton-v-trump.28703/page-788#post-7188231
who strongly disperses Trump for what he REALLY is- a man so full of himself that he thinks he can do anything.
Are you doing this on purpose?
Trump doesn't want war in the Middle East. The war is already there. Every action he is proposing is something in the hopes of ending the war quickly, instead of prolonging it.
Clinton wants a lengthy war not only in the Middle East, but with Russia as well. How is that better than Trump?
too long to list them all but these are basically all the reasons why Trump would be a poor President.
Proposed to create a database system to track Muslims in the U.S.
Advocated assassinating terrorists’ families
Urged supporters to beat up protesters at his rallies
Promised to deport U.S. citizens whose parents immigrated illegally, in violation of the 14th Amendment
Called for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S.
Suggested the U.S. should reduce its debts by partially defaulting on them
Doesn’t know how many articles are in the Constitution
Doesn’t pay his bills
Praised North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un
Named and threatened former students who criticized Trump University
Refused to rule out using nuclear weapons against ISIS
Suggested that he might refuse to serve as president if elected
Hired a suspicious number of advisers who have done work on behalf of Vladimir Putin
Praised the U.K.’s vote to leave the EU because a falling pound would be good for his Scottish golf course
Said that the U.S. military should withdraw from Japan and South Korea and allow those countries to defend themselves with nuclear weapons
( and that is despite both of these countries being a member ofAnti-nuclear organisations )
Believes the world would be “100 percent” better if Saddam Hussein and Muammar Qaddafi were still in power
Proposed to have China assassinate Kim Jong-un
(which is likely as America handing Aleska back to Russia for free)
Referred to 9/11 as 7-Eleven
...
...
and these are only SOME of the faults highlighted in the article.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/07/donald_trump_is_unfit_to_be_president_here_are_141_reasons_why.html
"Proposed to create a database system to track Muslims in the U.S."? LMAO, newsflash, this system already exists. next.
"Advocated assassinating terrorists’ families"? see point 1
"Urged supporters to beat up protesters at his rallies"? How about the Clinton Campaign paying mentally ill people to instigate violence, as shown in the O'Keefe videos?
"Promised to deport U.S. citizens whose parents immigrated illegally, in violation of the 14th Amendment"? The 14th Amendment that was only meant to apply to the newly-freed slaves, and which has been grossly misused by legislating-from-the-bench justices for all kinds of progressive agendas? Yeah sorry, anchor babies aren't citizens.
"Called for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S." ONLY UNTIL WE CAN GET A HOLD ON EVERYTHING AND CREATE A SYSTEM THAT CAN PROPERLY VET IMMIGRANTS.
"Doesn’t know how many articles are in the Constitution" A small mixup between articles and Amendments, when speaking off-the-cuff rather than from a teleprompter. mountain out of a molehill.
"Doesn’t pay his bills" Doesn't pay full price to contractors who don't hold up their end of the deal.
"Praised North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un" Ridiculously out of context, you should be ashamed of yourself. http://www.factcheck.org/2016/05/did-trump-praise-kim-jong-un/
"Named and threatened former students who criticized Trump University" does this look like a threat to you?
"Refused to rule out using nuclear weapons against ISIS" It's not as crazy as you think.
"Suggested that he might refuse to serve as president if elected" once again cherrypicked out of context
"Hired a suspicious number of advisers who have done work on behalf of Vladimir Putin"
"Praised the U.K.’s vote to leave the EU because a falling pound would be good for his Scottish golf course" He praised the E.U. referendum's outcome because it's a reclamation of sovereignty. Deal with it.
"Said that the U.S. military should withdraw from Japan and South Korea and allow those countries to defend themselves with nuclear weapons
( and that is despite both of these countries being a member ofAnti-nuclear organisations ) " And they were forced into it shortly after WWII. These nations see American military presence as stifling. Removal will grant them more sovereignty. You hate freedom don't you?
"Proposed to have China assassinate Kim Jong-un (which is likely as America handing Aleska back to Russia for free) " Not even close. I already explained this one to you a few pages back.
"Referred to 9/11 as 7-Eleven" Wow you're right. That makes him LITERALLY HITLER. Better let western civilization collapse over a freudian slip. It's 2016 after all.
How about instead of regurgitating poorly-constructed arguments from your favorite filthy globalist rags (word for word), you actually grow the agency to formulate your own arguments?
I really doubt 28,500 American troops is really what is holding off the North Korean attack. I think it has much more to do with the half-million active-duty South Koreans.
you know how many active soldiers North Korea have?
1,190,000 Active personnel
how many soldiers south have?
Active personnel 630,000
yeah... Even if they have 1960's equipment the sheet number can be used as "zerg rush" to overwhelm South Korea and gain important early victory in several key cities that are located close to North... heck even capital of South is located just few kilometres down the border between North and South! And North KNOWS about this.
the number of American soldiers are not really that important but the fact that they are there and the fact that should North attack South they have to attack American soldier is really important fact here.
https://archive.is/0pvPB
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
the hoax lawsuit filed by the guy who is notorious for repeatedly filing hoax lawsuits?
the hoax lawsuit that even Jezebel media covered and quickly debunked? http://jezebel.com/heres-how-that-wild-lawsuit-accusing-trump-of-raping-a-1782447083 http://jezebel.com/the-source-pushing-the-trump-rape-lawsuits-may-not-be-w-1783270283
That even Gawker media wouldn't report on because of how unauthentic it is?
Trump won't be going on trial in December. SDNY automatically issues an order scheduling a status conference when a complaint is filed without even looking at the complaint. That's the "court date" that you are talking about. Trump hasn't even been served with the complaint yet -- or, if he has, Doe's counsel hasn't filed proof of service under FRCP 4(j). I'm sure that will work out quite swimmingly. Just like how we protected Vietnam from the communists.
Oh wait we didn't.
Seriously What makes you think South Korea is anything like Vietnam
American soldier is there to remind Kim family that "hey don't mess with this little guy... you mess with him, you mess with me! got it!" America lost Vietnam because
1, they were NOT familiar with Vietnam jungle terran... which is NOT present in any part of Korea
2. America had bad press in South Vietman because of its support on unpopular leader while north Vietnam leader Ho chi minh had almost univeral support from all vietnam
which is NOT the case in South Korea. Many people in South Korea actually have postive opinion on America as a nation.. and almost all Koreans hate Kim family regiom... no sane koreans would support North... while in Vietnam war many Southern Vietnamese people suppiorted Ho Chi Minh.
False equalance much?
just to let everyone know how TERRIBLE Trump is at debating.
"MY VOICE IS LOUD SO I AM RIGHT!"
oh and video comments on how Hillary used Trump's weakness against him.
And to that I say... well done! That is what politician SHOULD be doing... be shewed and clever!
You can't win a game of politics just by being "knight of justice" and just by "playing it fair"
Also kinda funny how Trump supporters are being silent about all three debates... if Trump did well it SHOULD be all over here now...
---
It's just an election of false equivalencies spun for the Media.
Trump Sexually abusing women = Being married to Bill Clinton
Calling all Mexicans Rapist, Drug Dealers and saying you'll ban all muslims = Calling out Trump supports for being racist
Being on Putin's **** = emails
Trumps' Fraud that he's going on trial this Month = The Clinton Foundation (which, btw is ranked higher than the Red Cross for aid relief, and truly is an amazing Foundation)
Seriously tho, this election won't even be close, there's a reason why we have the Electoral College. It's to stop idiots from voting in a Jackass.
And Arlong, as I stated before, only amoral sociopaths can look past what Trump has said/done. So if you are just doing this for attention, you'll get no more from me or if you truly are an amoral sociopath, I have no intention of speaking to you further anyways...
Besides how could anyone want that hideous flabby, orange-skin, small handed monstrosity as the face of the greatest country in the world? Did you see how red his face turned during the debates? How would anyone take him seriously?
Also, make sure you get out and vote, regardless of your preference.