Football5

AKradian wrote: »

… (more)

DarkPassenger wrote: »

I'll say this again, the majority of players already made their decision, they wanted to be in a densely populated server, which is why they moved to Bera, those of you asking for a merge represent a small sample size of the population of players. You guys aren't the majority, you guys simply missed the event. So enough with majority and talks about those that want dead servers or a merge, because once again, the majority of players are already in a High Populated world. Those that wanted a larger community went to either reboot or bera.

Those of us that didn't participate (willingly) are those that stayed in the world we were in. And then there's the group that missed the event for either having taken a break (personal choice) or something else.

That's not entirely true.
There are people who wanted to move to a bigger world, but didn't want to pay the price (losing marriage/buddies/guild/alliance, storage, cash items, monster collection, legion, etc). They want a merge so they can retain all these things and still gain a large population around them.

I do agree that many people who stayed where they were, especially in worlds that have always been low-population (mostly those that make up MYBCKN and GRAZED), would likely choose to remain in a low-population world even if leaping incurred no loss. But you can't assume they all are like that.

Which is why my suggestion is that, after Nexon allies the non-Reboot NA worlds into 2 or 3 world, people should be allowed to choose which of these worlds they wish to be in. Not have it imposed on them by where they were before. (less)

Let's face it, the best solution is 3 worlds in total, for example, Bera (alive world, a lot of people), Khaini (desolate world, very very low population) and Reboot.....

Acgnolia wrote: »

JushiroNet wrote: »

With how small bacon is now even 5x the population would still make it a low pop server.

Legit the only reason we are advocating for a mass merge. All nexon has to do to dispel this idea is to show us some numbers. I already said it, I will be willing to admit im wrong on this suggestion when that happens.

Don't you get it? the majority in Bera are just botters.... I was in Henesys today and all I see are afkers everywhere (not that many as well), 10 botters in Henesys, but if you just go outside of henesys, you'll rarely run into legit players... and yet it still show that all the channels in bera are full.... HOW?! that doesn't make any sense...

JushiroNet wrote: »

They did show us numbers (unintentionally?) With the attendance meter for ark.

and for the record I don't agree with going all the way to merging every normal world together.

Bacon+windia
Scania + grazed + broni
Bera
Reboot

Would be what I would like. Or some combination of 3 normal servers... maybe 4.

Disagree.
Nothing will be changed to be honest.... people are judging by the bars (they see the channels at every world), but that's completey wrong, why? because the majority (in bera for example) are botters, if you just go outside of henesys, you'll rarely run into legit players... and yet it still show that all the channels in bera are full.... how is that makes any sense? can you please explain this to me?

DarkPassenger wrote: »

The original 5 servers were Scania, Bera, Broa, Windia, and Khaini. Why cant that be an option instead of one big world

Probably the worst idea I've read so far for today.
5 Normal worlds? won't see nor feel any change at all...

SadVirgin wrote: »

DarkPassenger wrote: »

The original 5 servers were Scania, Bera, Broa, Windia, and Khaini. Why cant that be an option instead of one big world

Well Broa and Khaini are already combined.

Exactly, that's why we must merge them as well into Bera.