HHG1

BBQTime wrote: »

HHG1 wrote: »

XenonFunz wrote: »

Nexon adding pic to storage has defeated me
I have no desire to play the game anymore because of this

That's a bit dramatic. It's a couple more clicks, just like with nodes. Annoying? Mildly. Worth quitting over? No.
But you choose the hill you want to die on I guess.

By reading your post I can tell that you're trying to soften this matter.

Why are there always a few people like you who are always on Nexon's side? he's definitely right.
I also find it really annoying because it's not just "a couple more clicks", it's a couple more clicks that we must do 100 times every single day.... I also quit because of this change.
Even if it's "just a couple more clicks", once you have to do it a lot of times everyday, it's became really painful and extremely annoying.

There is really no need to soften this extremely important matter at all.

Oh, I am definitely not always on Nexon's side. But throwing a tantrum and saying it has DEFEATED him and torn all the desire to play out of him is absolutely an overreaction to something as small as this.
Again, you choose which hill you want to die on. I think you're just going to have to get over it, like everyone else. The pin exists to protect players items if they are on a public or shared computer (more commonly net cafes in kms).

XenonFunz wrote: »

Nexon adding pic to storage has defeated me
I have no desire to play the game anymore because of this

That's a bit dramatic. It's a couple more clicks, just like with nodes. Annoying? Mildly. Worth quitting over? No.
But you choose the hill you want to die on I guess.

I knew I had seen this incredibly bad take before.

http://forums.maplestory.nexon.net/discussion/27046/enough-is-enough

Edit: I'll reiterate for convenience.
What you want is not less weekly scheduled maintenances, because that's a stupid request.
But you want there to be less bugs after a content-patch, which can be really hit-or-miss. Content patches are not part of the weekly scheduled maintenances. This time there was a huge amount of non-KMS content involved, in addition to the anniversary content and changes that involve the login-server. Nobody is surprised that a lot of things are broken.

Stopping weekly maintenances isn't going to change any of that. What you could be advocating for is more rigorous testing of new content. But even then some things can break once it goes live. And the game would still need frequent maintenance.

Or do you just not want any new content ever?

SuperSaiyan3 wrote: »

You do realize that this game is a massively multiplayer online game, what does it mean? let me explain it to you, it means that we must have as many people as possible, in other words, merge all paid servers.

Key note; as possible.
Bera already broke its designated maximum capacity with the previous transfer. If you recall, there came a point where people were unable to transfer more characters into Bera and Nexon had to manually move the remainder of those player's characters.
In any MMO there are set capacities to servers to assure that they don't become overpopulated to the point of instability, much like Bera was. That's how you end up with login-queues like in WoW and FFXIV for example, even though those have several separate servers as well.

If you're willing to sacrifice QoL just to have everyone in one server because that's how you personally define MMOs, then your outlook is incredibly flawed and short-sighted.

Your main concern is the burning level of popular maps? I assume you're in reboot then.

Would these private channels or instanced maps be available for every semi-popular map in the entire game? For every map that hackers destroy the burning on too? How many instances would be available? Because not even Bye-Bye was unlimited and wasn't always burning either.

So you want private maps, with some level of constant burning, and also with free kishin for some reason.
It's probably not gonna happen. It's not even necessary.