Wut? lol Did you just admit to being a brony? Everyone has a sex drive. We're not allowed to have fantasies?
Wow, he has the emotions of a child. No wonder he's been so unhinged in this thread, and so upset because some orange man said some mean things. n.
well I just said it to see how you would react and this proves that your mindset is stuck in 1960's. *clap clap clap*
spilled your tendies, did you? you were "only pretending to be retarded"? I don't think so, considering how upset you are about it. "wah you're stuck in the 60s!" I think you meant 50s anyway.
Wut? lol Did you just admit to being a brony? Everyone has a sex drive. We're not allowed to have fantasies?
Wow, he has the emotions of a child. No wonder he's been so unhinged in this thread, and so upset because some orange man said some mean things. n.
well I just said it to see how you would react and this proves that your mindset is stuck in 1960's. *clap clap clap*
spilled your tendies, did you?
this proves that you lots are intolerant and thinks America belongs to proper sorts and those "weirdos from outside" Those that do not fit our model MUST be put outside!
this proves that you lots are intolerant and thinks America belongs to proper sorts and those "weirdos from outside" Those that do not fit our model MUST be put outside!
There are dozens of countries that are socialist authoritarian-left havens. America, however, is the last of its kind, an endangered species. If the ousting of intellectually and emotionally immature nanny-state progressives is necessary for the conservation of this precious, delicate entity, then so be it.
this proves that you lots are intolerant and thinks America belongs to proper sorts and those "weirdos from outside" Those that do not fit our model MUST be put outside!
There are dozens of countries that are socialist authoritarian-left havens. America, however, is the last of its kind, an endangered species. If the ousting of intellectually and emotionally immature nanny-state progressives is necessary for the conservation of this precious, delicate entity, then so be it.
you DO realise America has NEVER been a nanny state right? Even under democrats its welfare system has been REALLY poor compared to Cannada, and European countries.
this proves that you lots are intolerant and thinks America belongs to proper sorts and those "weirdos from outside" Those that do not fit our model MUST be put outside!
There are dozens of countries that are socialist authoritarian-left havens. America, however, is the last of its kind, an endangered species. If the ousting of intellectually and emotionally immature nanny-state progressives is necessary for the conservation of this precious, delicate entity, then so be it.
you DO realise America has NEVER been a nanny state right? Even under democrats its welfare system has been REALLY poor compared to Cannada, and European countries.
you DO realize I never claimed it was? you DO realize I'm speaking of the future, not the past? I mean are you intentionally staw-manning me for no reason or is your reading comprehension that atrocious?
this proves that you lots are intolerant and thinks America belongs to proper sorts and those "weirdos from outside" Those that do not fit our model MUST be put outside!
There are dozens of countries that are socialist authoritarian-left havens. America, however, is the last of its kind, an endangered species. If the ousting of intellectually and emotionally immature nanny-state progressives is necessary for the conservation of this precious, delicate entity, then so be it.
you DO realise America has NEVER been a nanny state right? Even under democrats its welfare system has been REALLY poor compared to Cannada, and European countries.
you DO realize I never claimed it was? you DO realize I'm speaking of the future, not the past?
to look into the future one must look in the past. Democrats NEVER created "nanny states" in the past... what makes you think that they will create one now? and
There are dozens of countries that are socialist authoritarian-left havens
is incorrect... just because a country have a good social welfare does NOT make it a socialist country... I get that China is Socialist country BUT Canada? Australia? New Zealand? England? France? Germany? Italy? Switzerland? Are they all socialist authoritarian countries?
you DO realize I never claimed it was? you DO realize I'm speaking of the future, not the past?
to look into the future one must look in the past. Democrats NEVER created "nanny states" in the past... what makes you think that they will create one now? and
There are dozens of countries that are socialist authoritarian-left havens
is incorrect... just because a country have a good social welfare does NOT make it a socialist country... I get that China is Socialist country BUT Canada? Australia? New Zealand? England? France? Germany? Italy? Switzerland? Are they all socialist authoritarian countries?
is this not the trappings of an authoritarian government?
you DO realize I never claimed it was? you DO realize I'm speaking of the future, not the past?
to look into the future one must look in the past. Democrats NEVER created "nanny states" in the past... what makes you think that they will create one now? and
There are dozens of countries that are socialist authoritarian-left havens
is incorrect... just because a country have a good social welfare does NOT make it a socialist country... I get that China is Socialist country BUT Canada? Australia? New Zealand? England? France? Germany? Italy? Switzerland? Are they all socialist authoritarian countries?
is this not the trappings of an authoritarian government?
you DO know that you Americans have more security than any other country ( with the exception of China) right? I mean FBI spy you on internet ALL THE TIME http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240185543/FBI-spies-on-internet-users Not to mention the so called patriotic act that was signed by REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH!
Not to mention the so called patriotic act that was signed by REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH!
and continued by barack obama and praised by hillary clinton.
I can thwart PRISM. I can't hide from CCTV
and you think Trump is going to change it? what has he promised? kick out Muslims spy on Muslims who are legally American citizens and make them "report anything dangerous" build a great wall of America and make Mexico pay for it.
I don't think Trump will move away from national security as well. Let's be honest has EITHER TRUMP OR HILLARY PROMMOSED TO REMOVE IT?
Let's be honest has EITHER TRUMP OR HILLARY PROMMOSED TO REMOVE IT?
neither one, so that's really not a relevant issue since goes into the "con" column on pros/cons for both candidates.
and to go back to the topic... since America has been spying on people since George W. Bush... what makes you think that America is better than other countries with social welfare system?
Let's be honest has EITHER TRUMP OR HILLARY PROMMOSED TO REMOVE IT?
neither one, so that's really not a relevant issue since goes into the "con" column on pros/cons for both candidates.
and to go back to the topic... since America has been spying on people since George W. Bush... what makes you think that America is better than other countries with social welfare system?
What makes you think America needs to adopt these systems? Why can't it be allowed to be the last bastion of meritocracy? I know you're not going to view any of these videos because they are much too information-laden for you, but at least to prove a point that I tried, here's many videos on why socialism (or socialism-lite since you will argue it isn't real socialism because the government hasn't siezed the means of production) doesn't work well:
Let's be honest has EITHER TRUMP OR HILLARY PROMMOSED TO REMOVE IT?
neither one, so that's really not a relevant issue since goes into the "con" column on pros/cons for both candidates.
and to go back to the topic... since America has been spying on people since George W. Bush... what makes you think that America is better than other countries with social welfare system?
What makes you think America needs to adopt these systems? Why can't it be allowed to be the last bastion of meritocracy? I know you're not going to view any of these videos because they are much too information-laden for you, but at least to prove a point that I tried, here's many videos on why socialism (or socialism-lite since you will argue it isn't real socialism because the government hasn't siezed the means of production) doesn't work well:
you DO know the difference between socialist state like China and countries that are democratic AND capitalist but have social welfare like New Zealand and Germany right? for one thing THEY DO PICK LEADERS DIRECTLY VIA ELECTION! Unlike China.
Proved my point, you didn't even watch a single minute of any of the videos I linked.
Now get out.
and you are not thinking in humanitarian terms. And these countries have good social welfare and help the poor WHILE STILL BE RICH!
if you actually watched the videos (wow, you still haven't!) you'd find that they are very quickly declining in terms of their prosperity, spiraling speedily to a catastrophic demise.
Can't say I didn't try though. Sooner or later most people get redpilled. Honestly surprised he knew the distinction between socialism and a welfare state. Both are garbage though. Pepe's allegory of the media
Why is this still going? It was enough that this damn thread had to exist in the old forums, I don't need to be reminded of how much of a freakshow the world is every time I come to the new forums.
Comments
I don't think so, considering how upset you are about it. "wah you're stuck in the 60s!"
I think you meant 50s anyway.
I mean are you intentionally staw-manning me for no reason or is your reading comprehension that atrocious?
and is incorrect... just because a country have a good social welfare does NOT make it a socialist country... I get that China is Socialist country BUT Canada? Australia? New Zealand? England? France? Germany? Italy? Switzerland? Are they all socialist authoritarian countries?
and is incorrect... just because a country have a good social welfare does NOT make it a socialist country... I get that China is Socialist country BUT Canada? Australia? New Zealand? England? France? Germany? Italy? Switzerland? Are they all socialist authoritarian countries?
is this not the trappings of an authoritarian government?
is this not the trappings of an authoritarian government?
you DO know that you Americans have more security than any other country ( with the exception of China) right?
I mean FBI spy you on internet ALL THE TIME
http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240185543/FBI-spies-on-internet-users
Not to mention the so called patriotic act that was signed by REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH!
and praised by hillary clinton.
I can thwart PRISM.
I can't hide from CCTV
what has he promised?
kick out Muslims
spy on Muslims who are legally American citizens and make them "report anything dangerous"
build a great wall of America and make Mexico pay for it.
I don't think Trump will move away from national security as well.
Let's be honest has EITHER TRUMP OR HILLARY PROMMOSED TO REMOVE IT?
I know you're not going to view any of these videos because they are much too information-laden for you, but at least to prove a point that I tried, here's many videos on why socialism (or socialism-lite since you will argue it isn't real socialism because the government hasn't siezed the means of production) doesn't work well:
Now get out.
Pepe's allegory of the media
I think this sums up trump supporter quite nicely!
It was enough that this damn thread had to exist in the old forums, I don't need to be reminded of how much of a freakshow the world is every time I come to the new forums.