Aggraphine

Yep. It's specifically to enter and complete the dragon rider party quest.

It's a week. New accounts are trade-blocked for a week. It's a measure of fraud prevention, and doesn't significantly impact most people.

Strongest class ingame by far gets a well-deserved nerf, everybody goes apeshit

Sounds like you're just impatient, OP. That's not a good enough reason to muck with previously-set schedules.

TerrorStreak wrote: »

… (more)

Aggraphine wrote: »

Go post stupid things in your own thread, dax. Don't spread it to other ones.

Omg, that was such a hypocritical statement. You have derailed soo many of my threads with what i felt were non-sensical responses. Nice job Daxter give him a taste of his own medicine lol.

But for the future any one can post their opinion about the subject. Being called stupid for just giving your opinion just because it doesn't mesh with yours is soo shallow imo.

Back on topic, I feel if they are going to nerf kish and fury totems either frenzy needs to follow suite or be reintroduced back in to marvel and philo. As for removing frenzy, fury and kish while increasing base respawn.... would be nice, but dream on Nexon won't do this unless the entire player base forced them to via a mass organized walk out(won't ever happen).

Any who taking the high road up out of here before i get a snide rebuttle. (less)

You mean your threads where you asked that unequipped gear passively give its potential bonuses so that you can have your cake and eat it too between damage and drop gear? Or perhaps where you requested a cash item to circumvent the starforce destruction mechanic? Or when you declared heal lock to be some form of racial discrimination against a fictional entity? Or perhaps the one in which you basically admitted to having a gambling problem?

Gomenasai wrote: »

Aggraphine wrote: »

Go post stupid things in your own thread, dax. Don't spread it to other ones.

Wait, does Aggraphine actually agree to the fact that we must remove Kishin/Kanna? now that's a surprise, a very big one.

It shouldn't be. Only thing I'd change is simply refine it a bit, given that it's an almost two-year-old suggestion.